If the WSJ Needs Human Curation…
What we’ve seen by measuring it closely,” he said, “is that human-powered feeds do much, much better than automated ones, by any relevant metric.
via poynter.org
That quote was from Zach Seward, who runs the Twitter account for the Wall Street Journal. This week, the New York Times is also switching from an RSS automated Twitter feed to “hand-picking and writing the tweets and engaging with readers.”
Some of the most well read papers in the country, with the WSJ & NYT, are realizing the value of human powered curation.
It’s not enough for them to just post a headline and link.
Food for thought….
comment : 0
Spread & Share
No Comment





True for engagement but difficult to scale Michelle right?
hey michelle, seen this guy?
http://www.binarybacklinks.com
wonder where he’s got that idea from?;).
How’s that facebook social plugin working for you?
Isn’t it leaving out people who don’t have a facebook account?
Does this mean that they are eliminating automated feeds totally and only using hand powered feeds?